-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.6k
Feature/dateutils test #16013
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 3.3
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Feature/dateutils test #16013
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 3.3 #16013 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 60.74% 60.80% +0.05%
+ Complexity 11735 15 -11720
============================================
Files 1949 1949
Lines 88799 88799
Branches 13391 13392 +1
============================================
+ Hits 53939 53992 +53
+ Misses 29319 29263 -56
- Partials 5541 5544 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
zrlw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thank you |
Created DateUtilsTest.java to provide coverage for legacy date parsing and formatting logic.
Added test cases for standard string-to-date parsing (yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss).
Verified object-to-date casting (handling Long timestamps and Calendar objects).
Confirmed GMT/UTC formatting remains consistent.
Applied spotless formatting to ensure compliance with Apache Dubbo coding standards.